Editor’s note: The Athens NEWS is participating in a national campaign spearheaded by The Boston Globe to respond forcefully to President Donald Trump’s continued attacks on the free press, including his recent characterization of journalists as “real enemies of the people.” We are among 350-plus newspapers across the country (as of Wednesday morning) that are running editorials and columns today, Aug. 16, countering the president’s attacks on the press. Go to the Globe website for links to all the papers writing editorials as part of this project. – Terry Smith, editor
When the president attacks and demonizes the news media, calling them “the real enemy of the American people” and their output “fake news,” please don’t dismiss this as just another in a steady stream of Trump outrages, in the air briefly until his next crazy-angry tweet.
Trump’s long-time campaign to undermine and marginalize journalists, ramped up in recent weeks, appears wholly self-serving on the president’s part. From his point of view, the obvious way to deflect and defuse negative reports is to discredit the reporter and/or the news outlet he or she works for. It’s doubtful that he gives a fig about whether his attacks pose a danger to democracy or transparent government. As with everything else with this president, it’s all about him.
Yet, the consequences of the president continually attacking journalists and the free press easily transcend his personal issues or the daily news cycle. Our democracy is endangered when citizens are persuaded to reject or ignore the professionals who provide news and information, and whose mission is to keep government and other institutions accountable.
Back up and recall the role of independent journalists in a democratic society. You should have learned this in civics class. Journalists – whether working for newspapers, magazines, broadcast outlets or websites – are the eyes and ears of a free society. They provide citizens with the intel necessary to make informed, responsible decisions at the ballot box and beyond. They strive to keep their local, state and national governments honest.
In totalitarian regimes, newspapers are closed, journalists are jailed, and the state provides its own version of “news.” Citizens without accurate information are disempowered, weakened, blind. If a man doesn’t know what the weather is like outside, he won’t know how to dress. If a citizen doesn’t know what her government is doing, or what’s going on in the wider world outside state or national borders, she lacks the information to make practical, responsible decisions about important issues, career, money and family.
Fortunately, we don’t live in a totalitarian state. We live in a modern democratic republic (albeit one that’s increasingly dysfunctional). But that doesn’t mean the president’s persistent attacks on the news media are harmless.
If you can make citizens believe that journalists can’t be trusted, that established mainstream media outlets are hopelessly biased, you accomplish the same thing as censorship, arrests, closures. A discredited journalist or news outlet no longer has the authority or ability to inform the public. They may as well be locked away in an underground prison cell.
Likewise, the foundation of the American free press, this absolutely essential pillar of our democracy, crumbles and quakes when the president of the United States succeeds in poisoning the minds of a vast slice of the American public with his relentless attacks on journalists and the verified truths they report.
And it does have a trickle-down effect. Increasingly when a local public figure or candidate responds to a critical news report, rather than an old-fashioned explanation or denial, he or she will go immediately on the attack, calling the reporting “fake news” and suggesting the journalist is an incompetent liar with an ax to grind. In recent years, we’ve also seen political candidates boycott the media, something that was rare until a few years ago. That suggests these candidates (one of them our state senator during his campaign two years ago) have calculated that cutting out local news media that they perceive to be unsympathetic won’t hurt them. That wouldn’t have happened five, 10, 20 or 30 years ago.
This is terribly galling for the hundreds of thousands of journalists who do their jobs far away from the national stage. They work long and hard for not much pay, without many resources. So why do they (we) do it? Many of us, maybe most of us, fell in love with journalism because it’s a pursuit for truth and justice. Good reporting often succeeds in righting wrongs and making things better for people. More than anything, it engages citizens in civic and public affairs, and an actively engaged public is just as vital to our democracy as the free press.
It’s laughable and offensive, this idea that someone would choose a profession where they start out at peanut wages, and eventually climb into a mixed-nut salary range, all so they can serve as somebody’s shill or stooge, becoming a sell-out to sling PR for a political party or ideology.
This isn’t intended as a backhanded slap against the well-rewarded national journalists who draw so much of Trump’s criticism. They are drawn to negative coverage of the president the way a fire department speeds to an actual fire. The reality of a Trump-averse national press didn’t precede the president; it rumbled into action the minute the president started telling lies, hiring corrupt cabinet members, demeaning his own justice department, obstructing efforts to find the truth about his finances and Russian interference, making racist statements, inciting hatred against immigrants, and well, the list just keeps growing.
Ironically, this president, with his mantra of “fake news,” through a willful refusal to counter ongoing Russia efforts to sow discord on social media and interfere in the 2018 elections, is ensuring that Russian-instigated fabricated news reports and social-media posts will contaminate the media milieu right up until Nov. 6. While slinging the “fake news” slam directly at the mainstream media, Trump’s inaction on the counter-intelligence front is ensuring that the real thing – Russian-generated fake news specifically designed to divide Americans and influence the midterm elections – can slip in through the back door.
The journalists at the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and most of the cable and main networks are doing immensely important work, every bit as crucial as Woodward and Bernstein during Watergate in the early ’70s. When they get something wrong, everybody knows about it.
When the president calls them, and by extension all of us, “the real enemies of the people,” his goal may simply be to save his own hide. But the damage he does to truth and a free press – essential safeguards of American democracy – will take a long time to repair.
Please don’t let him get away with it.
Continue to be a careful consumer of news. Don’t believe everything you read. Find corroborating reports on stories that intrigue or trouble you. But don’t treat your news like a fan boy with the sports pages, preparing to like anything that’s positive about your team, and dismiss anything that’s negative. You’re a presumably educated adult citizen of the USA, and ought to behave that way.
If you like to root for your team with unalloyed enthusiasm and spirit, you’re in luck – the pro and college football seasons are only weeks away. But transferring that sort of “my team right or wrong” enthusiasm to political parties and President Trump signifies that you’re a poor citizen, a bad American. Encouraged by Trump, your disregard for facts and evidence and rejection of professional news reporting make you ripe for the plucking by opportunistic politicians, propagandist media and foreign agents with bad intentions. Don't be a sucker.
Post a comment as anonymous
Report
Watch this discussion.
(14) comments
You would think that Trump and his followers would be clamoring for the return of the Fairness Doctrine...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_fairness_doctrine
Nobody gets more air time for ignorance, stupidity, deception, fraud and general public comment than does Trump. That's far more "fairness" than the rest of the world deserves.
For the record, the “fairness doctrine” had everything to do with honesty, equity and balance – three words that aren’t found at Camp Trump.
You're right, of course, but it certainly would be ironic considering what took root and flourished when it was gone.
More campaign promises fulfilled than any President in recent history. Most honest President in a long time.
We aren't fascists like you
So, the people encouraged by Not-Trump are ok in their constant barrage of Anti-Trump stories and pure hatred for a man they knew very little about 4 years ago. It's exhausting to watch any news agency these days, be it for or against the president but that is exactly what is going on. Trump has only brought what always went on to the limelight now.
When I voted for him and watched him win I told my wife this Presidency will have so many... "this has never happened with any President before" or "this is not very Presidential" and I was right on the mark. Maybe not to the extent as it is today, but he said all along in the primaries what he wanted to do and hasn't changed that tune since.
Don't be a sucker and fall into any side. Remember, a sitting President can't serve more than two terms, so ramp up for 2020/24 if you don't like what you see, but back off with the constant hate speech, editorials and opinions associated with most people on the "other" side...
Uhhhh…, this isn’t about you or anyone from the “other” side, as you put it, unless you’re buying wholesale the slop that Mr. Trump is selling then turning around and marketing retail.
It’s about one man and his mouthpieces screaming “Fire!” in a crowded nation when there is no fire, doing so simply to watch the turmoil as the masses churn. This is about a “man” who incites violence from the bully pulpit. Take that squirrel off his head and replace it with a taqiyah or amamah and he would have been whisked away to Guantanomo or some other hell hole long ago.
Mr. Trump is a vane, narcissistic crap stirrer, not a salesman, not a businessman, not anything that anyone should admire. He’s been that way and that’s been his brand since long before any campaign and he’ll be that way to the grave.
That’s not hate. That’s a sad reality that 7 billion people have to endure.
Which President hasn't been narcissistic? At least he isn't getting us into war, causing Civil wars and wreaking havoc like the last several Presidents have.
(I'm not picking on you in particular, but you're the only local paper that's got an editorial up at the moment).
Hi,
See my issue with all these editorials is a sort of refusal to see the entire context.
I've honestly read more articles, op-eds, and seen broadcasts in the last few years that were insulting, degrading, and dehumanizing that was directed at me for immutable traits I carry.
The New York Times hires and editor who believes "White people should live in caves like goblins" Or something to that effect, of course it's just "jokes". https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/02/business/media/sarah-jeong-new-york-times.html
Gamer gate, painted me as a toxic sexist whom is also mindlessly aggressive and idiotic. (Damn dude, I only have a hobby).
I'm a white Ohioan from a rural background, so obviously I must be racist as well right? Or we can follow that philosophical line that's come in vogue, that everyone is some type of "ist" and apply that liberally to full effect to ensure people can be seen as something other than human. Professor George Yancy was given a huge platform to speak his mind about how all white people are just "awful racists" and then another even larger platform on the New York times to highlight the handful of threats he got, while he never address the very valid arguments against his Calvinist racial guilt rhetoric.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/16/opinion/white-racism-threats.html
But you’re not my enemy eh? Sure they are opinions, but they are the opinions that get published. By publishing and thus standing by this, Journalists have made testament to where they stand on these issues by not decrying them or at least giving equal platform for ideas that counter them. You are engaging in what amounts to "half-truths". Truth that fits the narrative and the ideology you want to spread. This is emblematic of all news rooms everywhere. Highly the worse, create a narrative, and disregard any and all facts that could affect said narrative. Like the famous times photo of the refugee girl… who was indeed not taken from her mother?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44578339
Sad when I require a foreign Outlet to give me factual news about something going on in my own nation.
The truth, which I guess is what we're talking about here. Is there is an almost ideological hegemony with in journalism and the press. Where only one ideological constant is allowed a voice with in most publications. That ideological voice is very much against me... its against my values, it hates me for my race, and it hates me because I don’t fit neatly in the allowed ideologies. I've been called more awful things by the journalism class that I'm almost numb to it this rate. I don't trust "journalism" even though typically I liked to consider myself not a sucker, but one can only take so many attacks and attacks on his culture before I can't help but sympathize with Trump.
Before you ask, no I don't like Trump, but in that same breath I find that the current strain of Journalism cares nothing for me, at best... at worse is ideologically opposed to my very existence.
So In a way, my frustration with all of this comes from the fact that none of you in the Journalism class take a look in the mirror. You don't write truths, you write the half-truths that push narratives and further cements the ideological and cultural hegemony you want. If one is not fall within that ideological purity you seek, we are attacked. We're "toxic" or "Racist" or "Sexist" or "Idiots" or any number of insults and degrading rhetoric is hip that day.
So excuse me if I have trouble exercising sympathy or even the base level of care at this rate for the "journalism" class, I'm not seeing articles about corrupt government officials and need to know stories. No the papers fill themselves up to "preach to the choir" style rhetoric to remind all those loyal readers just how inhuman and stupid, and evil all those "other people are".
Do I want journalists hurt or maimed or silenced? No.
If you don't want to be the enemy of the people, maybe Journalists should stop positioning themselves as that enemy. Your publication may not write such things about its own community, but those whom you are allying yourself with, do. Thus the ally of my enemy, is thus my enemy.
Either own that and stop the belly aching, or truly question whether you have been charitable to the very people that you swear you’re trying to tell the truth.
In my humble and honest opinion, the fifth estate on almost all levels hasn't been very charitable to me. So thus, why should I be charitable to it?
In a nutshell - The press declared war on Trump (and conservatism in general) and is now surprised that there is a counter-attack. Cry me a river.
Part of the privilege of the free press is that they are supposed to inform the people on all events. They are supposed to be our watchdogs. For the most part the US media has climbed into bed (both figuratively and literally) with the Democratic party. They have completely abdicated their objectivity and responsibility, and so deserve to lose their privileges along with it.
Get back to us when you decide that you want to report the news and not shape the news, get back to us when you remember how to separate news from opinion and agenda.
Please enlighten everyone as to how the Constitution supports your conclusion that the free press should lose privileges.
"The first amendment states "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;"
Just as the law allows limits on free speech rights under certain circumstances, so too should the press be held accountable when they abuse their responsibility. The press is given special access that the rest of us don't get, is it not right that we should expect them to honor that special privilege and actually report all the facts? The press isn't reporting facts, they're injecting opinion into news, picking and choosing news to fit their agenda, inciting people to try and bring down a duly elected president. Trump can't stop them from printing what they want, but he certainly has the right to point out their overt hostility and blatantly unbalanced reporting. #FREE PRESS is a joke, they have joined the opposition party as purveyors of propaganda.
Cherry picking the Constitution again, eh “Edward?” You pulled that double standard so fast the entire world just got whiplash, even those belted in with five-point and helmet harnesses.
No caveats on the 2nd Amendment, at least not according to your ten commandments. But you’re all over press restrictions when the facts don’t line up with your …, uh…., peculiar perceptions.
Just wondering…, is pimping for Donald an internship for you or a paid position?
edward: if your accountability measures were enacted your precious fox "news" would be the first to go down. they spout blatant lies, but because it all praises conservatives it "must be the only real news", eff that noise. tre45on and his gang has even taken to calling walter cronkite "fake news" for simply criticizing the "president"
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Please write and submit your comment, and after a short delay it should post to the comment section of the chosen article, as long as it abides by the standard rules below. (On occasion, the delay will be longer but we will get to it as soon as we can. Thanks for your patience.)
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.